Prabowo Questions Anies Concerning Air Pollution in Jakarta During Presidential Dispute

The National Campaign Group (TKN) of Prabowo Subianto-Gibran Rakabuming Raka has assembled a group of 98 lobbyists in prep work for the governmental debate performed by the General Election Payment (KPU) on Tuesday, December 12, 2023. The inaugural presidential discussion will certainly focus on themes such as legislation, human civil liberties, administration, anti-corruption initiatives, and strengthening democracy.

Nusron Wahid, the Assistant of TKN Prabowo-Gibran, revealed that the event of these 98 activists was prompted by among the debate’s styles, particularly civils rights (HAM). He kept in mind that concerns regarding Prabowo’s past would inevitably emerge, provided that governmental elections take place every five years. Nusron Wahid shared these insights during a press meeting at the TKN Prabowo-Gibran Library in Kebayoran Baru, South Jakarta, on Monday, December 11, 2023.

One of the 98 lobbyists, Budiman Sudjatmiko, who additionally acts as a Member of the Expert Council for TKN Prabowo-Gibran, emphasized that problems associated with events from 25 years earlier have been fixed both politically and legally. Budiman clarified that politically, Prabowo previously served as the vice-presidential prospect alongside Megawati throughout the 2009 political election, symbolizing that existing competitors in the autonomous procedure have currently recognized there are no political concerns with Prabowo.

Additionally, Budiman explained that Prabowo has actually twice joined presidential elections, symbolizing that he has actually been legally recognized within the selecting system. He insisted that Prabowo is fit for the duty, with no legal evidence recommending criminal involvement. Therefore, he highlighted that Prabowo has actually become part of the democratic procedure for 25 years, both historically and in the here and now.

Throughout the celebration, Budiman also exposed the factors for sustaining the Prabowo-Gibran ticket. He expressed the belief that Prabowo-Gibran represents the continuity and renovation of the achievements of the previous 25 years. He emphasized the demand for unity, specifically despite enhancing difficulties, as they jointly strive to accomplish their responsibilities to the nation and history.

Natalius Pigai, a former Commissioner of the National Commission on Person Legal Right (Komnas HAM) from 2012 to 2017, insisted that prabowo subianto ( is not implicated in any kind of accusations of human legal rights abuses. Pigai made this declaration after assessing Komnas pork’s examination findings. He highlighted that Prabowo’s name does not show up in the final thoughts concerning cases of civils rights offenses.

Pigai clarified that neither Ganjar Pranowo nor Anies Baswedan’s names appear in the list of thought human civil liberties lawbreakers. Thus, he insisted that all presidential candidates in the 2024 political election are clear of claims related to human civil liberties violations. Pigai identified any accusations against Prabowo as spoken violence, hate speech, and disrespect.

Pigai competed that accusations of Prabowo’s participation in major human rights misuses are largely politically inspired, intended to acquire an advantage over political challengers. He highlighted that Komnas pork is the single organization constitutionally equipped to carry out investigations into civils rights offenses. According to Pigai, the results of Komnas pork’s inquiries contain no reference of Prabowo Subianto.

He noted that questions relating to Prabowo’s past would usually develop, given that presidential political elections take place every five years. Natalius Pigai, a former Commissioner of the National Payment on Human Civil Liberty (Komnas HAM) from 2012 to 2017, insisted that Prabowo Subianto is not implicated in any type of accusations of human legal rights misuses. He highlighted that Prabowo’s name does not appear in the final thoughts regarding cases of human legal rights violations.

Pigai contended that allegations of Prabowo’s involvement in severe human legal rights abuses are largely politically inspired, planned to gain a benefit over political challengers.

Campaign activities, as defined in the law, involve participants in the elections or their representatives convincing voters by offering their vision, mission, programs, and/or their own image. These activities can include:

Throughout a governmental argument on December 12, 2023, prospect number 2, Prabowo Subianto, was seen mocking candidate number 1, Anies Baswedan’s declaration at the Election Commission workplace (KPU).

Presidential candidate Anies Baswedan addressed the concern of “ordal” throughout the 2024 governmental argument, particularly during his discussion with Prabowo Subianto.

Anies described the adjustment in the age limitation for presidential and vice-presidential candidates by the Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi). This modification benefited Gibran Rakabuming Raka, that ultimately ended up being Prabowo Subianto’s running mate. Significantly, the judge leading the Constitutional Court at the time was Anwar Usman, Gibran’s uncle.

Anies shared his stress with the “ordal” phenomenon during the debate on Tuesday, December 12, 2023. He defined how this phenomenon showed up in different elements of life, from joining a team to registering in school or perhaps getting concert tickets.

Anies did not explicitly mention Gibran, Prabowo Subianto immediately reacted by emphasizing the significance of political elections in a freedom.

Prabowo insisted that in a democracy, ultimate power resides the people, and the highest authority is the body politic. He advised Anies that on February 14, it would certainly be the individuals that make a decision the result. If their selections were wrong, Prabowo recognized that the people would hold him liable.

Anies also questioned Prabowo concerning his sensations relating to ethical infractions allegedly committed by previous Constitutional Court Chairman Anwar Usman.

Prabowo responded by specifying that he valued the Constitutional Court’s choice. He stated that lawful specialists had actually validated the decision’s validity and honest factors to consider had been resolved.

Prabowo stressed that the Constitutional Court’s decision was last and could not be changed, so he would comply with it.

He likewise stressed that they were not children, and eventually, it was individuals that would make the final judgment. If the people did not support Prabowo and Gibran, they had the power to make a decision.

In recap, throughout the dispute, Anies Baswedan elevated concerns regarding the “ordal” phenomenon, which he observed in numerous elements of life and also in the highest possible tiers of the political process. Prabowo Subianto, in action, underscored the value of democracy, political elections, and the best power of individuals in figuring out the nation’s leadership.

Related Articles

Entre em contato pelo WhatsApp